Insights & news

Belgian and Dutch Competition Authorities Aim Again at Pharmaceutical Sector

  • 25/01/2023
  • News

As if on cue, the Belgian and Dutch competition authorities announced on 24 January 2023 new significant developments with regard to their enforcement activities in the pharmaceutical sector. The Belgian Competition Authority (BCA) indicated that it had imposed a fine of EUR 2,782,808 on Novartis for allegedly abusive behaviour, while the Dutch Competition Authority (Autoriteit Consument en Markt or ACM) said it had begun to investigate the pharmaceutical sector for excessive pricing and illegal bundling practices (see, attached press releases).
The BCA took the view that Novartis abused a collective dominant position which it allegedly holds with Roche in relation to therapies for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Novartis was accused of misleading ophthalmologists, hospitals and public authorities in warning against the off-label use of Avastin®, an oncology medicine of Roche, at the expense of its own, more expensive product Lucentis® which, unlike Avastin®, is indicated for the treatment of AMD.
According to the BCA, the position taken by Novartis is not supported by scientific evidence and is therefore misleading and abusive. The BCA thus emulated in part the proceedings which the French competition authority had pursued against both Novartis and Roche in 2020 in a case that gave rise to a fine of EUR 444 million (see, Van Bael & Bellis Life Sciences News and Insights of 9 September 2020). However, an important difference with the French procedure is that the BCA only fined Novartis and not Roche. Additionally, the fine levied in Belgium is only a fraction of that imposed in France.  
The Netherlands   
The inquiry of the ACM has just started and took the form of requests for information sent to three unidentified pharmaceutical firms which may have charged excessive prices for medicines that are claimed to be innovative, but, according to ACM, may in reality not be the fruit of high development costs and innovation. While the press release of ACM is short on detail, its wording is reminiscent of the excessive pricing case which ACM brought against Leadiant in 2021 (see, Van Bael & Bellis Life Sciences News and Insights of 20 July 2021).
ACM declared that it would also investigate illegal bundling practices of products and services. It added that its investigation purposefully keeps the pharmaceutical sector in its crosshairs.


Key contacts

Related practice areas

Related insights

Sign up for updates
    • 04/01/2023
    • News

    Belgium Takes Final Steps to Formalise Cooperation with Luxembourg on Surveillance of Medicines and Health Products

    On 27 December 2022, the Belgian Official Journal published a Law of 7 November 2022 giving assent to the Cooperation Treaty between the Kingdom of Belgium and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg regarding Medicines and Health Products, as signed in Luxembourg on 17 January 2018

    Read more
    • 23/12/2022
    • News

    Court of Justice of European Union Clarifies Advertising Rules for Medicinal Products Not Subject to Medical Prescription or Reimbursement

    On 22 December 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered a judgment in response to a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Constitutional Court of Latvia, concerning the application of Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (the Directive). The judgment clarifies that the concept of “advertising of medicinal products” within the meaning of the Directive not only covers the advertising of a specific medicinal product, but also extends to advertisement campaigns for categories of medicines by pharmacies. The judgment also holds that Member States are not precluded from prohibiting advertisements of a type not listed in Article 90 of the Directive, if the aim of the national measure is to safeguard public health by discouraging irrational use.

    Read more
    • 14/12/2022
    • News

    Lithuanian Competition Authority Fines Pharmacy Association and Individual Firms for Collusion while Participating in Margin-setting Procedure

    According to the attached press release of yesterday’s date, the Lithuanian competition authority (Konkurencijos Taryba or KT) levied total fines of more than EUR 72 million on the Lithuanian Pharmacy Association and 8 individual pharmaceutical companies. While KT imposed a record fine, the allegedly cartel-like conduct that prompted the fine is unusual and raises delicate questions regarding the borderline between legitimate collective advocacy and illegitimate collusive behaviour. The public version of the actual decision of KT and the judgment on appeal which the Regional Administrative Court of Vilnius is expected to deliver will hopefully clarify the dividing line between these two types of conduct.

    Read more

Subscribe to our updates

Please select the practice areas you are interested in: *