Insights & news

Van Bael & Bellis successfully assists ACT in support of Intel’s challenge to abuse of dominance decision imposing €1.06 billion fine as EU Court of Justice sets aside judgment

  • 06/09/2017
  • News

In a judgment issued today, the EU Court of Justice has set aside the judgment of the EU General Court of 12 June 2014, which affirmed the EU Commission’s decision of 13 May 2009 imposing a fine of €1.06 billion on Intel for allegedly granting rebates and payments to customers conditional on exclusivity.

Upholding Intel’s and ACT’s first ground of appeal, the Court of Justice found that the General Court had failed to properly examine Intel’s arguments that the rebates at issue were not capable of restricting as-efficient competitors. As a result, the Court of Justice set aside the judgment and referred the case back to the General Court. 

Van Bael & Bellis represented the Association for Competitive Technology (ACT), a trade association representing more than 5,000 IT firms worldwide, in support of Intel’s challenge to the Commission’s 2009 decision.

ACT was represented in this matter by Van Bael & Bellis partners Jean-François Bellis and Tim Kasten. Further details on the case can be found on the EU Court of Justice’s website.

Key contacts

Related practice areas

Related insights

Sign up for updates
    • 02/08/2019
    • Newsletters

    VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2019, No. 07

    The July 2019 issue of our newsletter, VBB on Competition Law, which covers major developments in competition law at both the European Union and Member State levels.  Click below to view and download the issue.

    Read more
    • 09/07/2019
    • Newsletters

    VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2019, No. 06

    The June 2019 issue of our newsletter, VBB on Competition Law, which covers major developments in competition law at both the European Union and Member State levels.  Click below to view and download the issue.

    Read more
    • 14/06/2019
    • News

    Andreas Reindl speaks on “SEPs, FRAND, and EU Competition Law” at the Workshop on Big Data and Anti-Monopoly in Beijing

    On 7 June 2019, Van Bael & Bellis partner Andreas Reindl spoke at the Workshop on Big Data and Anti-Monopoly in Beijing before an audience consisting mainly of members of China’s judiciary. Andreas discussed in particular under what circumstances EU competition law may limit the right of SEP holders to obtain injunctive relief against implementers when the parties have failed to enter into a FRAND license agreement, emphasizing that courts may still grant an injuction if they find that the implementer has not negotiated in good faith.

    Read more

Subscribe to our updates

Please select the practice areas you are interested in: *