Insights & news

Van Bael & Bellis assists and represents the Republic of Benin at the 36th session of UNCITRAL's Working Group III on Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform

  • 08/11/2018
  • News

Van Bael & Bellis associate Quentin Declève assisted and represented the Republic of Benin during the 36th session of Working Group III (the “Working Group”) of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (“UNCITRAL”).

In July 2017, the UNCITRAL Commission granted the Working Group a broad mandate to work on the possible reform of investor-State dispute settlement (“ISDS”). That mandate was divided into three distinctive stages: (i) identify and consider concerns regarding ISDS; (ii) consider whether reform was desirable in light of any identified concerns; and (iii) if the Working Group were to conclude that reform was desirable, develop any relevant solutions to be recommended to the UNCITRAL Commission.

The first phase of the mandate was initiated in November 2017 (in Vienna) and was completed in April 2018 (in New York City). At the end of that first phase, the Working Group identified a list of procedural and structural concerns with ISDS, relating to: (i) concerns pertaining to consistency, coherence, predictability and correctness of arbitral decisions by ISDS tribunals; (ii) concerns pertaining to arbitrators and decision makers (including their impartiality and independence, the existence of conflicts of interests and issues of “double hatting”); and (iii) concerns pertaining to cost and duration of ISDS cases.

Meeting in Vienna from 29 October 2017 until 2 November 2018, the Working Group initiated and completed the second stage of its mandate and found that these concerns about ISDS were serious enough to merit reform. The Working Group is now expected to start working, in April 2019 in New York, on a work plan that will be followed throughout the third phase of its mandate.

The discussions taking place within the Working Group are crucial for the future of ISDS. Possible options for reform range from soft law to more systemic approaches such as the establishment of a multilateral investment court proposed by the European Union and its Member States.

In a statement made on behalf of the Republic of Benin, Quentin Declève emphasized Benin's willingness to work on a systemic reform of ISDS and to push for the establishment of a multilateral investment court.

The assistance and representation offered by Van Bael & Bellis to the Republic of Benin is part of Van Bael & Bellis' pro bono programme.

Key contacts

Related insights

Sign up for updates
    • 15/05/2019
    • News

    Isabelle Van Damme is quoted by Law360 on the impact of Opinion 1/17 on the European Commission’s negotiating position in UNCITRAL

    Isabelle was quoted this week in an article published in Law360 on the Court of Justice of the European Union’s Opinion 1/17 regarding CETA. The article, entitled “EU Investor Court Greenlighted, But May Face Rough Road”, discusses the implications of this opinion on the ongoing negotiations in UNCITRAL aimed at reforming investor-State arbitration mechanisms. In her remarks, Isabelle reflected on the impact of Opinion 1/17 on the European Commission’s negotiating position in those UNCITRAL talks as well as in bilateral negotiations.

    Read more
    • 14/05/2019
    • News

    Van Bael & Bellis hosts CEPANI40 seminar on investment arbitration and EU law

    On 8 May 2019, Van Bael & Bellis hosted a CEPANI40 seminar during which experts in EU and arbitration law discussed the intricacies of the relationship between investment arbitration and EU law. CEPANI40 is an organization founded by CEPANI, the Belgian Centre for Arbitration and Mediation, specifically aimed at young professionals with an interest in arbitration. The introductory keynote speech was delivered by Melchior Wathelet, formerly the First Advocate General and Judge at the Court of Justice of the European Union. Following this keynote speech, Van Bael & Bellis counsel Isabelle Van Damme then moderated a panel composed of Mrs Emily Hay (Hanotiau & van den Berg) and Mr. Tim Rusche (European Commission) which discussed the aftermath of the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Achmea. Van Bael & Bellis associate Quentin Declève then moderated a second panel composed of Mr. Colin Brown (European Commission) and Mrs Carinne Pochet (Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs) which discussed Opinion 1/17 on the compatibility with EU law of the investment Court System contained in CETA. That panel also discussed the implications of Opinion 1/17 on the current reform of investor-State dispute settlement which is currently being negotiated at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Pictures of the event can be consulted here.

    Read more
    • 07/05/2019
    • Articles

    CJEU rules that CETA ISDS mechanism is compatible with EU law

    On 30 April 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decided in Opinion 1/17 that the chapter on investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) in the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part (CETA) is compatible with EU primary law. On 29 January 2019, Advocate General Bot had already reached the same conclusion (for an analysis, see here). Opinion 1/17 removes a significant obstacle to the ratification of CETA by the EU Member States and the ratification of investment protection agreements with, for example, Singapore and Vietnam, which contain similar chapters on ISDS. The Opinion also significantly boosts the European Union negotiating position in the ongoing United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) negotiations on ISDS reform. At the same time, the Opinion might, to some extent, tie the hands of the European Union in negotiating in that forum.

    Read more

Subscribe to our updates

Please select the practice areas you are interested in: *