Insights & news

French Competition Authority drops charges against car rental companies for exchanging detailed and

  • 07/04/2017
  • Articles

On 27 February 2017, the French Competition Authority (“FCA”) decided to close a ten-year investigation into information exchanges between car rental companies without imposing any sanction.

The FCA investigated whether information exchanged through airport management authorities facilitated collusion between car rental companies operating at French airports. In particular, twelve French airport management authorities contractually required car rental companies (i.e., Europcar, Avis-Budget, Hertz, Citer, Sixt and Ada) to provide them on a monthly basis with information relating to their turnover, and the number of contracts signed for the purposes of: (i) calculating the fee payable by the rental companies to the airport management authorities for the right to use publicly owned space; and (ii) reallocating available parking spaces. In return, under the contract signed with the airport management authorities or simply in practice, each company received from the authorities the information provided by each of the other car rental companies. In addition, some of the airport management authorities concerned also provided the car rental companies  with data on market shares and the average value of contracts which they had calculated (in other cases, the car rental companies could calculate these figures themselves using the turnover and contract numbers communicated by the authorities). 

In its decision, applying an effects test, the FCA assessed whether this exchange of information “reduce[d] strategic uncertainty in the market.” The FCA assessment relied on two factors, namely (i) the market structure and (ii) the nature (strategic or not) of the information exchanged.  The FCA noted that the car rental market at airport hubs is oligopolistic and is usually limited to the six players under investigation. The FCA then examined the nature of the information exchanged, stating that “it is necessary to determine whether the transmission of the individual turnover and the number of contracts concluded by each of the car rental companies during the previous month was such as to reduce the uncertainty in the market sufficiently so that each company was able to identify the pricing and commercial strategies of its competitors with sufficient precision to adapt its behaviour accordingly”. In this respect, the FCA underlined that the information was exchanged on an aggregated basis to the extent that it did not distinguish between rentals to private individuals and professional customers, which are considered to form two different car rental markets. The FCA also highlighted that there was no evidence establishing that any of the companies under investigation had adapted their behaviour on the market. Accordingly, the FCA concluded that the information exchanged was not strategic and did not impede competition.

The Italian Competition Authority (“ICA”) followed a similar reasoning in a decision dated 30 March 2017. In this case, car rental competitors also exchanged detailed information through a professional association. The ICA concluded that there was no evidence that the information exchanged reduced the uncertainty in the market or otherwise restricted competition.

Key contacts

Related practice areas

Related insights

Sign up for updates
    • 14/06/2019
    • News

    Andreas Reindl speaks on “SEPs, FRAND, and EU Competition Law” at the Workshop on Big Data and Anti-Monopoly in Beijing

    On 7 June 2019, Van Bael & Bellis partner Andreas Reindl spoke at the Workshop on Big Data and Anti-Monopoly in Beijing before an audience consisting mainly of members of China’s judiciary. Andreas discussed in particular under what circumstances EU competition law may limit the right of SEP holders to obtain injunctive relief against implementers when the parties have failed to enter into a FRAND license agreement, emphasizing that courts may still grant an injuction if they find that the implementer has not negotiated in good faith.

    Read more
    • 07/06/2019
    • News

    Van Bael & Bellis lawyers speak at seminar on EU competition law developments in Tokyo on 5 June 2019 organised in collaboration with Keidanren, the Japan Business Federation

    Van Bael & Bellis lawyers spoke at a seminar on EU competition law developments on 5 June 2019 at the headquarters of Keidanren – the premier organization representing Japanese business, whose members include the main Japanese multinational companies – in Tokyo before a large audience. Thomas Kramler, Head of Unit, DG Competition, European Commission, spoke on EU competition policy in the digital era. Van Bael & Bellis partners Kris Van Hove and Andrzej Kmiecik and counsel Etsuko Kameoka spoke on developments in the areas of cartels, vertical restraints and legal professional privilege, respectively. Keidanren Executive Director, Takashi Inoue, opened the event, while Van Bael & Bellis Chairman Jean-François Bellis delivered introductory and concluding remarks.

    Read more
    • 06/06/2019
    • Newsletters

    VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2019, No. 05

    The May 2019 issue of our newsletter, VBB on Competition Law, which covers major developments in competition law at both the European Union and Member State levels.  Click below to view and download the issue.

    Read more

Subscribe to our updates

Please select the practice areas you are interested in: *