Insights & news

Implications of the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement under WTO law

  • 16/06/2017
  • Articles

As a result of President Donald Trump's announcement on 1 June 2017 of the US’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, policymakers from other countries now consider imposing a carbon tariff on US goods.

This Memorandum looks into the legality under World Trade Organisation law of several of the trade policy instruments that could be employed by parties to the Paris Agreement in order to respond to the US’ decision.

Key contacts

Related insights

Sign up for updates
    • 27/02/2019
    • News

    Van Bael & Bellis shines in Chambers Global 2019 with top-tier rankings for its EU competition and international trade practices

    Van Bael & Bellis has once again achieved outstanding results in Chambers Global 2019, recently published online, where the firm and its lawyers are described in superlative terms by clients and peers. While the firm’s larger teams of EU competition and international trade continue to occupy the top bands, and our head of dispute resolution is “excellent”, our corporate M&A team is once again ranked amongst the top independents in the Brussels market. Our international trade and WTO team receives accolades for being “really sharp” with a “very good reputation” and work that is “strong and robust” and for the lawyers’ ability to “easily understand [clients’] needs, including not only the legal issues but also the commercial aspects. They are very good at finding the best solution considering all aspects of the issue”. Jean-François Bellis “remains a prominent figure in the trade market in Brussels”. Philippe De Baere is “‘an outstanding professional’ with a wealth of experience in the field of trade disputes and customs”. Richard Luff is noted for his expansive experience in the trade law field: both on EU mandates and in WTO trade disputes. Benoît Servais is lauded as being “‘a very strong lawyer’, particularly praising his ability in disputes and noting that ‘he is very strong at the European courts’”. Fabrizio Di Gianni is praised by clients for being “very fast and giving very clear advice” and for his “positive and reasoned approach”. Pablo Muñiz is “very good at reverting to our needs and considering all aspects of the question”, while Yuriy Rudyuk “is described by clients as ‘constructive and inventive’”. The EU competition team receives equally high praise. Jean-François Bellis is “like an encyclopaedia of EU competition and trade law, the best person for the cross-over between trade and competition”. David Hull is a “pragmatic lawyer with a cutting edge understanding of legal developments and regulatory trends, who offers very clear risk-based advice”. Clients appreciate that Andrzej Kmiecik “provides very thorough analysis, but also very pragmatic and practical solutions, and is always attentive to clients’ needs”. Porter Elliott is described as a “true expert in his field who gives very practical advice and is willing to pitch in and participate with the business”. Kris Van Hove is “responsive and does a good job of providing a broad overview but also giving concrete answers”. Clients appreciate that Markus Wellinger is “humble, open to discussions, very supportive and responsive, and is here to help”. Johan Van Acker displays a “really good understanding of [clients’] business and the commercial risk within a short space of time”. Fabrizio Di Gianni and Gabriele Coppo are both listed as Foreign Experts for Italy. Corporate/M&A partner Michel Bonne is described by clients as a “very commercial, efficient lawyer with fast reaction times and good follow-up”. Dispute resolution partner Catherine Longeval is praised for being “excellent, very detail-oriented and responsive”.

    Read more
    • 30/01/2019
    • Articles

    Opinion 1/17 on CETA: Advocate General Bot finds that the investment court system in CETA is compatible with EU law

    On 29 January 2019, Advocate General Bot delivered his long-awaited Opinion (the Opinion) on whether the investment court system (ICS) in Chapter Eight, Section F, of the European Union-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) is compatible with European Union (EU) law, in particular with the autonomy of the EU legal order and fundamental rights. The next step in the proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), initiated by Belgium following complications in its ratification process, is for the CJEU to deliver its Opinion on the same question. This client alert discusses the key elements of the Opinion and the implications of these CJEU proceedings on the European Union’s common commercial policy and its policy of advocating reform of existing investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) and the establishment of a multilateral investment court (MIC).

    Read more

Subscribe to our updates

Please select the practice areas you are interested in: *