Insights & news

Protection of Business Assets in Russia and Ukraine under International Investment Law

  • 25/03/2022
  • News

Russia’s military action in Ukraine together with its announcement of retaliatory measures in response to international sanctions are likely to have significant implications for foreign investors with investments in Russia and/or Ukraine. Following the critical response of the international community to Russia’s invasion and the widespread imposition of sanctions, Russia has already drawn up a list of unfriendly countries which could be targeted. As more multinationals suspend their operations in Russia, Russia has also announced various measures intended to stem the outflow of foreign capital including the possibility that the assets of any such foreign investors seeking to exit operations in Russia could be nationalised without compensation.

Russia still remains bound by the international treaties which it has signed and ratified. This Client Alert considers the protections and remedies which might be available to foreign investors affected by Russian measures under International Investment Law. 


Key contacts

Related practice areas

Related insights

Sign up for updates
    • 20/06/2022
    • News

    Opinion 1/20: Belgium’s request is inadmissible but CJEU still confirms its decision in Komstroy that intra-EU ECT arbitration is incompatible with EU law

    On 16 June 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) published Opinion 1/20, concluding that Belgium’s request for an opinion on the draft modernised Energy Charter Treaty’s (“ECT”) compatibility with EU law is inadmissible. The Court’s Opinion was in response to Belgium’s request for an opinion submitted on 2 December 2020, in which Belgium had asked whether the draft modernised ECT is compatible with EU law. Although refusing to opine directly on Belgium’s questions, the Court highlighted that it had already answered the question of the compatibility of Article 26 of the ECT with European Union (“EU”) law in disputes between investors of one EU Member State and another EU Member State (“intra-EU disputes”). In doing so, the CJEU effectively confirmed its earlier judgment in Case C-741/19, Republic of Moldova v. Komstroy LLC (see our client alert here) which had – even if as an obiter dictum – expressly dealt with the arbitration provisions in the ECT as currently in force.

    Read more
    • 13/06/2022
    • News

    Nicholas A. Lawn recognised in the 11th edition (2023) of The Best Lawyers in the United Kingdom

    Van Bael & Bellis is pleased to announce that Nicholas Lawn, our Head of International Arbitration, has been recognised in the 11th edition (2023) of The Best Lawyers in the United Kingdom™. Nick is ranked for his work in international arbitration. Since it was first published in 1983, Best Lawyers® has become one of the most respected guides to the legal profession globally, publishing its annual survey based on peer-review.

    Read more
    • 18/05/2022
    • News

    Investor-State Claims against Mexico: Recent Developments in the Energy and Mining Sectors

    As an update to our August 2021 client alert, this client alert provides an overview of the most recent regulatory developments in the energy and mining sectors in Mexico and their potential effect on foreign investments.

    Read more

Subscribe to our updates

Please select the practice areas you are interested in: *