Insights & news

Van Bael & Bellis successfully represents cable operators Nethys and Brutélé in proceedings against regulated wholesale tariffs for access to cable networks

  • 06/11/2017
  • News

On 25 October 2017, in four separate judgments, the Brussels Court of Appeal annulled two sets of decisions adopted in 2013 and 2016 by the Belgian telecommunications regulators. These decisions determine the wholesale tariffs applicable to the access to, and use of, cable operators’ networks by their competitors, such as Orange Belgium.

The four judgments are significant as they annul with retroactive effect all of the tariff rules imposed by the telecommunications regulators following the opening of the cable networks in Belgium in 2011.

More specifically, the Court found that the 2013 decisions lacked adequate reasons as the Belgian regulators had ignored the European Commission’s opinion on the draft decisions without explaining why they chose not to follow it. The Court also found fault with the regulators’ approach to consider Nethys and Brutélé as a single cable operator. Finally, the Court held that the 2016 decisions were also invalid as they relied on the annulled decisions of 2013 and were, in addition, based on an outdated analysis of the broadcasting market in breach of EU telecommunications law.

Van Bael & Bellis partner Peter L’Ecluse and associates Valérie Lefever, Eléonore Waterkeyn and Quentin Declève represented cable operators Nethys and Brutélé.

Key contacts

Related practice areas

Related insights

Sign up for updates
    • 30/11/2021
    • Newsletters

    VBB on Belgian Business Law, Volume 2021, No. 10

    The October 2021 issue of our Belgian Business Law newsletter reporting on the latest developments in a range of areas, including competition, data protection, intellectual property and labour law.

    Read more
    • 25/11/2021
    • Articles

    EDPB Explains Concept of International Transfers under GDPR and Discusses Interplay with Territorial

    On 19 November 2021, the European Data Protection Board (the EDPB) published Guidelines 05/2021 on the Interplay between the application of Article 3 and the provisions on international transfers as per Chapter V of the General Data Protection Regulation (the GDPR) (the Guidelines) for public consultation. The Guidelines are intended to clarify which international transfers of data fall within the scope of Chapter V of the GDPR and therefore require safeguards or other measures to ensure protection of the personal data that are being transferred. In addition, the EDPB calls on the European Commission to adopt a new set of Standard Contractual Clauses for cases where the importer established in a third country is already subject to the GDPR on the basis of the application of GDPR to non-EU based organisations under Article 3(2) of the GDPR. First, the Guidelines set out when a processing constitutes a “transfer of personal data to a third country or to an international organisation” (a Transfer) which triggers the application of the provisions of Chapter V of the GDPR. The Guidelines provide three cumulative criteria that, when satisfied, means a processing qualifies as a Transfer: thus, data must be sent or made available: (i) by a controller or a processor (i.e., an exporter), which, regarding the given processing, is subject to the GDPR pursuant to Article 3 (i.e., the territorial application of GDPR); (ii) to a different controller, joint controller or processor (i.e., an importer); (iii) which is in a third country, regardless of whether or not this importer is subject to the GDPR in respect of the given processing. The Guidelines further describe each criterion, providing some practical examples. Moreover, the Guidelines stress that Chapter V of the GDPR also applies to transfers or disclosures of personal data carried out by controllers or processors which are not established in the European Union (EU) but are subject to the GDPR pursuant to Article 3(2) because they: (a) offer goods or services to data subjects in the EU; or (b) monitor the behaviour of data subjects in the EU, to another controller or processor. By contrast, if the three cumulative criteria identified by the Guidelines are not met, there is no Transfer and Chapter V of the GDPR does not apply. For instance, the Guidelines explain that a situation whereby a controller in a third country collects data directly from data subjects in the EU does not constitute a Transfer. However, in such a case, the EDPB makes it clear that the controller or processor which is subject to the GDPR under Article 3 is still accountable for all processing that it controls, regardless of where such processing takes places, and that the risks of data processing in third countries must still be managed in order to comply with the GDPR. Second, the Guidelines outline that where all the above criteria are met, the processing will be considered to be a Transfer and the exporter must comply with the conditions laid down in Chapter V of the GDPR. This means that the controller or processor must use the instruments that aim to protect personal data after they have been transferred to a third country or to an international organisation. These instruments include: • the existence of an adequate level of protection in the third country or international organisation, pursuant to Article 45 of the GDPR or, in the absence of such adequate level of protection; • the implementation by the exporter of appropriate safeguards, pursuant to Article 46 of the GDPR (i.e., standard contractual clauses, binding corporate rules, codes of conduct, certification mechanisms, ad hoc contractual clauses, international or administrative agreements); or • derogations under Article 49 of the GDPR. In that regard, the Guidelines explain that the content of these safeguards must be customised based on each situation. When controllers and processors develop relevant transfer tools, such as Standard Contractual Clauses, they must take account of Article 3(2) so as not to duplicate the GDPR obligations, but rather to address what is missing and hence, fill the gaps. For example, such tools must address the measures to be taken in cases of a conflict of laws between third country legislation and the GDPR. In line with this approach, the EDPB encourages the development of a transfer tool for those cases where the importer is subject to the GDPR for a given processing pursuant to Article 3(2). The Guidelines can be consulted here and are subject to public consultation until the end of January 2022.

    Read more
    • 12/11/2021
    • Articles

    Belgium - Publication and Presentation of Policy Note Public Health - Impact on Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Sectors

    The Minister of Social Affairs and Public Health (the Minister) just published his policy note (beleidsnota/note de politique générale) which he is scheduled to present to the Committee for Health and Equal Opportunities of the federal Chamber of Representatives on 16 November 2021 (the Policy Note – see, attachment). The Policy Note goes in tandem with the healthcare budget (estimated to reach EUR 31,755,422,000,000 in 2022). The Policy Note discusses the full range of public health policy aspects, including financing, managing health crises, reorganising public healthcare, access, quality control, care efficacy, evidence-based care, healthcare professions, preventive measures, addictions, digitisation of care, related policies, international relations and financial control of payers (sick funds) and healthcare practitioners. Unsurprisingly, the Policy Note deals extensively with pharmaceuticals and medical devices as well. The following points stand out: • Industry cooperation - As was the case for his predecessor, the Minister will again conclude agreements with the pharmaceutical and medical devices sectors to “define the priorities of each stakeholder in the interest of public health and specifically the patient” (p. 54). • Shortages - The Minister will complete the regulatory framework governing medicine shortages (p. 54) and promises to publish “very soon” a first implementing decree in relation to the transparency of wholesaler-distributors. Other implementing decrees will follow and Belgium will also advocate for the expansion of the existing joint procurement and emergency stock measures at EU level (p. 55 and p. 77). • Regulatory reorganisation and efficacy-enhancing measures for in vitro diagnostics and personalised medicine – The Minister will streamline and accelerate procedures by reorganising the various authorities involved in authorising and reimbursing care. An example is that of the joint contributions towards one specific form of treatment by clinical biology, companion diagnostics and medicines (p. 55 and p. 56). • Unmet medical need – The Minister announces a range of initiatives with regard to clinical trials, access and financing of innovative therapies, and medicine repurposing (p. 40, p. 41, p. 58, and p. 59). • Reimbursement of medicines – The Policy Note repeats an earlier promise that the procedure governing the reimbursement of medicines, including Managed Entry Agreements, will be assessed and revised (p. 57). Contrary to earlier indications, the Policy Note does not tackle the role of the pharmaceutical sector in financing hospitals, even though hospital financing is addressed extensively (p. 5, p. 22, p. 23, p. 24, p. 25, p. 31, and p. 32).

    Read more

Subscribe to our updates

Please select the practice areas you are interested in: *