Insights & news

Van Bael & Bellis assists the retail industry in securing an injunction by the European Commission suspending Slovakia’s tax on the food retail sector

  • 05/04/2019
  • News

On 2 April 2019, the European Commission opened an in-depth investigation into a tax on the food retail sector in Slovakia over concerns that the way in which the tax is structured gives some retailers a selective advantage over their competitors, thus involving State aid in breach of EU rules. At the same time, the Commission issued an injunction requiring Slovakia to suspend the application of the measure until the Commission has concluded its assessment under EU State aid rules.

The complaints giving rise to the Commission’s afore-mentioned decisions were lodged in December 2018. Van Bael & Bellis counsel Gábor Báthory assisted the retail industry in this matter. Further details on this case can be found here.

Key contacts

Related insights

Sign up for updates
    • 05/08/2019
    • Newsletters

    VBB on Belgian Business Law, Volume 2019, No. 07

    The July 2019 issue of our Belgian Business Law newsletter reporting on the latest developments in a range of areas, including competition, data protection, intellectual property and labour law.

    Read more
    • 05/08/2019
    • Articles

    Court of Justice of European Union Creates Questionable Regulatory Shortcut for Parallel Imports of Generic Medicines

    The Court of Justice of the European Union recently issued a puzzling judgment regarding parallel imports of generic medicines. Please find attached a case note discussing the judgment. We also attach a copy of the judgment itself.

    Read more
    • 24/07/2019
    • Articles

    Belgium and Italy - Consumer Protection Organisations File Excessive Pricing Complaints Against Biogen Over Price of Spinraza®

    The Belgian consumer protection organisation Test Aankoop / Test Achats (“TA”) announced today that it submitted a complaint to the Belgian Competition Authority against Biogen, the marketing authorisation holder of Spinraza® (active substance: nusinersen)(see attached press release). Spinraza® is a medicine used to treat 5q spinal muscular atrophy “(SMA”), a genetic disease that causes weakness and wasting of the muscles, including the lung muscles. The disease is linked to a defect on chromosome 5q and symptoms usually start shortly after birth. SMA is a rare disease and Spinraza® was designated as an orphan medicine by the European Medicines Agency back in 2012. Spinraza® has so far also been the only medicine to obtain reimbursement following joint negotiations with the Belgian and Dutch authorities under the umbrella of the Beneluxa arrangement (see, Van Bael & Bellis Life Sciences Newsflash of 12 July 2018). TA’s competition complaint seems to form part of a larger effort directed by European consumer organisation BEUC which has also given rise to a complaint before the Italian competition authority (see attached). In its complaint, TA alleges that Biogen is charging excessive prices for Spinraza®. It maintains that research has shown an unjustifiable imbalance between the investments made by Biogen and the price charged by the firm. TA therefore urges the BCA to qualify Biogen’s conduct as abusive, order Biogen’s pricing practice to be stopped and impose a fine on Biogen. This case, if pursued, would be a first in Belgium and probably around Europe. While a number of excessive pricing cases have been initiated in the pharmaceutical sector by both national competition authorities and the European Commission, no such procedure would seem to have been started against a patented product that benefits from orphan medicine status. This is probably no coincidence, because monopoly prices resulting from intellectual property rights and regulatory schemes such as those encouraging the development of orphan medicines are a reward for risky investment, a consideration which TA seems to ignore. The fact that innovation should be encouraged and rewarded would also appear to be irrelevant from TA’s perspective. In addition and paradoxically, TA acknowledges that it does not actually know which price Biogen is charging since this forms the subject of a Managed Entry Agreement whose financial terms are confidential. The list prices cited in TA’s press release are unlikely to be accurate. Lastly, it will be difficult for the BCA to find that Biogen engaged in abusive conduct when that firm had to face the powerful buyers that are the Belgian and Dutch reimbursement authorities.

    Read more

Subscribe to our updates

Please select the practice areas you are interested in: *