Insights & news

Substantial changes to the Hungarian Competition Act

  • 07/12/2016
  • Articles

Substantial changes to the Hungarian Competition Act

On 6 December 2016, the Hungarian Parliament adopted substantial changes to the Hungarian Competition Act, which were published in Hungary’s official journal on 15 December 2016 (the “Amendment”). With some exceptions, the new provisions will enter in force on 15 January 2017. The main changes include the following:

Merger control

Under the current regime, mergers must be notified to the Hungarian Competition Authority (the “GVH”) if, in the preceding business year, the undertakings concerned achieved a combined turnover of more than HUF 15 billion (approximately €50 million) and the turnovers of at least two of the groups concerned exceeded HUF 500 million (approximately €1.6 million). The Amendment modifies this regime in the following ways:

First, the Amendment increases the above-mentioned HUF 500 million threshold to HUF 1 billion (approximately €3.2 million), thus limiting the group of mergers that must be notified by virtue of meeting turnover thresholds.

Second, the Amendment creates a new regime for mergers that do not meet the HUF 15 billion and the new HUF 1 billion thresholds (see above) but still must be notified if

  • it is not obvious that the concentration does not significantly lessen competition on the relevant market, particularly by creating or strengthening a dominant position; and
  • the combined turnover of the groups concerned exceeded HUF 5 billion (approximately €16 million).

The mergers falling under this new regime are not subject to any standstill obligation and the GVH may only investigate them for six months after the implementation of the concentration (whereas concentrations that must be notified for meeting the HUF 15 billion and HUF 1 billion thresholds may be investigated for five years).

While currently the thresholds for companies registered in Hungary is calculated on the basis of their worldwide turnovers, pursuant to the Amendment, such companies’ thresholds will also be calculated on the basis of turnover achieved in Hungary only.

Importantly, in the future, pursuant to the Amendment, concentrations will first need to be notified to the GVH in a simplified form. Following that notification, the GVH will need to decide within 8 days whether to initiate an investigation, otherwise the concentration can be implemented. The administrative fee for such notifications will amount to HUF 1 million (approximately €3,200).

While dawn raids are currently only available for the investigation of alleged abuses of a dominant position or restrictive agreements, pursuant to the Amendment, dawn raids will also be available in merger cases, for the investigation of gun jumping and the provision of incomplete or incorrect data.

Private enforcement

The Amendment transposes Directive 2014/104 on antitrust damages actions (the “Damages Directive”), resulting in a number of changes.

Previously, damages could not be collected from leniency applicants who received full immunity, unless the other cartel members were unable to pay. After the Amendment, leniency applicants will be liable for the damage caused to their own direct or indirect purchasers or suppliers.

The Amendment opens the way for the courts to order the disclosure of certain information based on a reasoned request subject to certain exceptions (e.g. privileged communication).

Pursuant to the Amendment, damages applicants will be able to benefit from a rebuttable presumption concerning the passing-on defence (i.e. the defendant will need to prove that the price increase has been passed on) and will continue to benefit from the ten-percent-presumption under Hungarian competition law (i.e. the defendant will need to prove that the price increase was less than 10%).

Leniency regime

Previously, leniency was available only for horizontal hard-core cartels. Following the Amendment, all agreements directly or indirectly aiming at the setting of prices, including vertical price-fixing, can be subject to leniency applications.


Undertakings admitting the infringement in a settlement procedure were able to receive a 10% discount from fines. In order to make settlements more attractive, the Amendment increased the maximum level of the fine-reduction to the level of between 10% and 30%.

Key contacts

Related practice areas

Related insights

Sign up for updates
    • 16/11/2018
    • News

    Jean-François Bellis moderates panel at LeadershIP EU’s 2nd annual conference in Brussels

    On 13 November 2018, Van Bael & Bellis co-managing partner Jean-François Bellis moderated a panel at LeadershIP EU’s 2nd annual conference, which explored the impact of IP and competition policy on global business and innovation looking toward the future, 5G and emerging technologies. The panel was titled Effects-Based Analysis: Where Do We Stand on Both Sides of the Atlantic? and the discussion focused on the competition law trends in the US and the EU in the area of effects-based analysis. The other panel members were the Honourable Douglas Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and Sir Robin Jacob, Sir Hugh Laddie Chair of Intellectual Property Law, University College London and Former Justice in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. Further details about the conference are available here.

    Read more
    • 01/11/2018
    • Newsletters

    VBB on Belgian Business Law, Volume 2018, No. 10

    The October 2018 issue of our Belgian Business Law newsletter reporting on the latest developments in a range of areas, including competition, data protection, intellectual property and labour law.

    Read more
    • 31/10/2018
    • Newsletters

    VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2018, No. 10

    The October 2018 issue of our newsletter, VBB on Competition Law, which covers major developments in competition law at both the European Union and Member State levels.

    Read more

Subscribe to our updates

Please select the practice areas you are interested in: *