Insights & news

German Federal Court of Justice rules on the statute of limitations for follow-up damages claims

  • 29/06/2018
  • Articles

On 12 June 2018, the German Federal Court of Justice (“FCJ”) delivered a highly anticipated judgment that clarified that the suspension of the limitation period for cartel damages claims also applies to claims that arose prior to the entry into force of the new provision setting out the suspension.

The case giving rise to this ruling concerned damages claims against grey cement producers. The claimant, a trader of building materials, filed for damages against a producer of grey cement on the basis of the defendant’s participation in the grey cement cartel between 1993 and 2002, for which it was fined by the Bundeskartellamt (the German Federal Cartel Office) in 2003. The judgment of the Regional Court of Mannheim, which initially granted the claim, was overturned by the Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe on the grounds that the claim was time-barred (see VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2017, No.1).

The provision at issue, section 33(5) of the German Act against Restraints of Competition in the version dated 7 July 2005, states that the limitation period for a claim for damages pursuant to paragraph (3) of the same provision (which lays down the claim for damages against a cartel infringer) shall be suspended if and when cartel proceedings are initiated by a competition authority. The issue at hand was whether this provision, which came into force on 1 July 2005, applies retroactively to damages claims based on infringements which occurred prior to its entry into force. The majority of German courts had ruled in favour of such a retroactive effect (see VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2017, No.6 and No.9; Volume 2015, No.4).

The FCJ confirmed this view. The full decision is not available yet, but according to a press release of 12 June 2018, the reasoning of the FCJ follows the general legal concept concerning limitation periods, pursuant to which claims arising prior to the date of entry into force of a new provision fall under the new legal regime, provided that they were not yet time-barred at that moment.

This ruling will extend the possibility of bringing damages claims, namely for past infringements. Before the FCJ’s decision, different courts in Germany had issued opposing decisions on the issue. Shortly before the FCJ’s ruling, the Regional Courts of Stuttgart and Hannover granted three distinct follow-on damages claims for truck purchases in judgments dated 16 April 2018 and 30 April 2018, joining the view of the majority of German Higher Regional Courts in the matter. The claims followed from the infringement decision of the European Commission of July 2016 establishing the participation of MAN, Volvo/Renault, Daimler, Iveco and DAF in a price-fixing cartel between 1997 and 2011 (see VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2016, No.7). These decisions are in line with the outcome of the FCJ’s ruling which now creates legal certainty on the matter.

Key contacts

Related practice areas

Related insights

Sign up for updates
    • 13/02/2019
    • News

    Thibaut D’hulst and Darach Connolly quoted by Politico on the recent German Bundeskartellampt decision on Facebook

    Van Bael & Bellis counsel Thibaut D’hulst and associate Darach Connolly were quoted by Politico on the recent Facebook decision by the German competition authority – the Bundeskartellampt – which links data protection and competition law in a novel decision.

    Read more
    • 11/02/2019
    • News

    Johan Van Acker nominated by GCR for competition lawyer of the year under 40

    Van Bael & Bellis partner Johan Van Acker has been nominated for a Global Competition Review (GCR) Award in the category of “Competition Lawyer of the Year – Under 40”. Johan Van Acker is one of eight nominees worldwide singled out by GCR as a “competition lawyer under the age of 40 whose superior technical skill, practical judgement and excellence in client service in 2018 demonstrate that he or she is among the very best in the field”. Voting for the GCR awards is now open (for GCR subscribers) until midnight, 22 February 2019 at the following link.

    Read more
    • 11/02/2019
    • News

    Porter Elliott and Johan Van Acker author chapter on “Merger control in the EU”

    Thomson Reuters have published their Practical Law guide on global merger control law, which features a chapter on “Merger control in the EU” authored by Van Bael & Bellis partners Porter Elliott and Johan Van Acker. This chapter answers the critical questions that typically arise in an EU merger control review with respect to the regulatory framework, jurisdictional thresholds, procedures and timetables, substantive test and remedies, amongst others. The chapter can be accessed here. Porter Elliott and Johan Van Acker are also the authors of the EU chapter of Merger Control: International Series, now in its third edition, for which Jean-François Bellis and Porter Elliott serve as General Editors. Jean-François Bellis and Porter Elliott are also the Contributing Editors of the 2019 Chambers Global Practice Guide for merger control.

    Read more

Subscribe to our updates

Please select the practice areas you are interested in: *